Skip navigation

Daily Archives: September 14th, 2011

Brianna Haberman-Lawson


This is an essay written by Brianna Haberman-Lawson when she was a final year student in Education Studies at the University of Northampton.

It was written as an assignment for the Education, Culture & Society module (EDU3004) that Brianna studied during the 2010-2011 academic year.

Brianna’s essay can now be found at The Flow of Ideas website:

Haberman-Lawson, B. (2011) Education and Bonus Culture, an essay written for EDU3004 ‘Education, Culture and Society’ module, Education Studies, School of Education, University of Northampton, 10th January, online at ‘The Flow of Ideas’:

Posted here by Glenn Rikowski

The Flow of Ideas:


The Ockress:

Industrial Revolution


The Birth of Capitalism: A 21st Century Perspective
By Henry Heller

Paperback | 9780745329598 | £19.99 / $35
Hardback | 9780745329604 | £65 / $110

For more information or to buy the book visit:

In the light of the deepening crisis of capitalism and continued non-Western capitalist accumulation, Henry Heller re-examines the debates surrounding the transition from feudalism to capitalism in Europe and elsewhere.

Focusing on arguments about the origin, nature and sustainability of capitalism, Heller offers a new reading of the historical evidence and a critical interrogation of the transition debate. He advances the idea that capitalism must be understood as a political as well as an economic entity. This book breathes new life into the scholarship, taking issue with the excessively economistic approach of Robert Brenner, which has gained increasing support over the last ten years. It concludes that the future of capitalism is more threatened than ever before.

The new insights in this book make it essential reading for engaged students and scholars of political economy and history.

HENRY HELLER is a Professor of History at the University of Manitoba, Canada. He is the author of ‘The Cold War and the New Imperialism: A Global History, 1945-2005’ (2006); ‘The Bourgeois Revolution in France’ (2006) and ‘Labour, Science and Technology in France 1500-1620’ (1996).


Preface and acknowledgements
Introduction: problems and methods

1. The Decline of feudalism
2. Experiments in capitalism: Italy, Germany, France
3. English capitalism
4. Bourgeois revolution
5. Political capitalism
6. The Industrial Revolution: Marxist perspectives
7. Capitalism and world history



To request an inspection copy please send the following details to

– the course name
– the level of the course (level one, two, three or post-graduate)
– the start date of the course
– expected number of students on the course
– name of local (or university) bookshop
– full university address (this is where the book will be sent)

We need all these details to be able to be able to process a request. Inspection copies are provided with an invoice that is cancelled if the book is adopted for a course, or returned in a resalable condition.

You can also request inspection copies using our online form at


Many Pluto books are available electronically. Libraries can subscribe to the Pluto eBook list via The Academic Library ( Individual titles can be ordered from many vendors, including Dawson ( in the UK and Ingram ( in the UK, US and worldwide.


If you would like to request a copy of a book to review for a journal or other publication, please email our publicity manger Jon Wheatley, providing your contact details and the name of the publication you intend to review the book for.


To place an order, visit our website at

Best regards,

Jonathan Maunder

Academic Marketing
Pluto Press
Tel: 020 8348 2724


Posted here by Glenn Rikowski

The Flow of Ideas:

Online Publications at:

MySpace Profile:

The Ockress:

Rikowski Point:


Theodor Adorno


*****Call for Papers******

‘The Actuality of Adorno: Theatre, Performance, and the Culture Industry Reconsidered (again)’

The PSi Performance and Philosophy working group

@ Performance Studies international #18

University of Leeds,UK

27 June – 1 July 2012


Invitation to contribute to a panel organised by the ‘Performance and Philosophy Working Group’

‘The Actuality of Adorno: Theatre, Performance, and the Culture Industry Reconsidered (again)’


The aim of this panel is to revisit and interrogate Theodor W. Adorno’s seminal critique of the ‘culture industry’, which he articulated in his collaborative work with Max Horkheimer (Dialectic of Enlightenment) as well as in numerous studies of cultural criticism that explore the status of art in the administered world of advanced capitalism.

We invite paper presentations that pursue Adornian perspectives and compositional stylistics in order to re-engage with his dialectical critique of the culture industry through specific sentences, phrases, and ideas composed by Adorno himself. As such, we ask that those interested in contributing to this panel build a paper around a specific Adorno quotation that deals with the culture industry. Or, in other words, we ask that proposals treat Adorno quotations as fragments through which to re-view the workings of the culture industry as it extends into the realms of theatre and performance in the present.

You may choose from one of the following quotations or select your own from Adorno’s body of work.


From: ‘Culture and Administration’, Adorno: The Culture Industry, trans. Rolf Tiedmann (New York: Routledge, 1991).

‘Through the sacrifice of its possible relation to praxis, the cultural concept itself becomes an instance of organization; that which is so provokingly useless in culture is transformed into tolerated negativity or even into something negatively useful—into a lubricant for the system, into something which exists for something else, into untruth, or into goods of the culture industry calculated for the consumer. All this is registered today in the uncomfortable relation between culture and administration’ (117).


From: ‘Cultural Criticism and Society’, Prisms; Also in Critical Theory: A Reader, ed. Douglas Tallack (1995). The page numbers below refer to this edition:

‘Cultural criticism shares the blindness of its object.’ (291)

‘The dialectical critic of culture must both participate in culture and not participate. Only then does he do justice to his object and to himself.’ (296).


From: Aesthetic Theory, trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor (London: The Athlone Press, 1997):

‘The consumer arbitrarily projects his impulses – mimetic remnants – on whatever is presented to him. Prior to total administration, the subject who viewed, heard, or read a work was to lose himself, forget himself, extinguish himself in the artwork. The identification carried out by the subject was ideally not that of making the artwork like himself, but rather that of making himself like the artwork.

This identification constituted aesthetic sublimation; Hegel named this comportment freedom to the object. He thus paid homage to the subject that becomes subject in spiritual experience through self-relinquishment, the opposite of the philistine demand that the artwork give him something.’ (17)

‘The poles of the artwork’s deaestheticization are that it is made as much a thing among things as a psychological vehicle of the spectator. What the reified artworks are no longer able to say is replaced by the beholder with the standardized echo of himself, to which he hearkens.’ (17)


From: Negative Dialectics, trans. E.B. Ashton (1973): ‘All post-Auschwitz culture, including its urgent critique, is garbage….Whoever pleads for the maintenance of this radically culpable and shabby culture becomes its accomplice, while the man who says no to culture is directly furthering the barbarism which our culture showed itself to be’ (367).

‘The power of the status quo puts up the façades into which our consciousness crashes. It must seek to crash through’ (17).

‘Direct communicability to everyone is not a criterion of truth. We must resist the all but universal compulsion to confuse the communication of knowledge with knowledge itself, and to rate it higher, if possible—whereas at present each communicative step is falsifying truth and selling it out’ (41).


From ‘Culture Industry Reconsidered’ in Adorno: Essays on the Culture Industry (Routledge)

‘The masses are not the measure but the ideology of the culture industry, even though the culture industry itself could scarcely exist without adapting to the masses’ (99).

‘The autonomy of works of art, which of course rarely ever predominated in an entirely pure form, and was always permeated by a constellation of effects, is tendentially eliminated by the culture industry, with or without the conscious will of those in control’ (19).

‘The concept of technique in the culture industry is only in name identical with technique in works of art. In the latter, technique is concerned with the internal organization of the object itself, with its inner logic. In contrast, the technique of the culture industry is, from the beginning, one of distribution and mechanical reproduction, and therefore always remains external to its object’ (101).


Please send a 350-word abstract (including your affiliation and technical requirements) to the session organisers Will Daddario and Karoline Gritzner

Deadline for proposals: Friday 7th October 2011

Please note that, as usual, the panel as a whole will still have to be submitted to the PSi 18 conference organizers – so even if session organizers accept your proposal, this is not a guarantee of participation in PSi 18.


Performance & Philosophy Working Group (PPWG) wiki:

Performance Studies International (PSi) website:




‘I believe in the afterlife.

It starts tomorrow,

When I go to work’

Cold Hands & Quarter Moon, ‘Human Herbs’ at: (recording) and (live)


‘Maximum levels of boredom

Disguised as maximum fun’

Cold Hands & Quarter Moon, ‘Stagnant’ at: (recording) and (live, at the Belle View pub, Bangor, north Wales)  


Posted here by Glenn Rikowski

The Flow of Ideas:

Online Publications at:

MySpace Profile:

The Ockress:

Rikowski Point:


Ben Linis


Second Call for Papers

Revista Pléyade nº8

Year iv, 2nd Semester 2011


“Sovereignty, Representation and Authority: Current Interpretations of Political Theology”

Carl Schmitt’s claim that “all significant concepts of the modern theory of the state are secularized theological concepts,” written in 1922, has proven to be influential in contemporary political thought. On the one hand, this claim has given rise to efforts to understand the inherent relation between religion and politics, both of which were traditionally thought as being separate regions.

On the other hand, Schmitt’s concept of political theology, which is based on the power of the “sovereign” has given rise to interpretations that connect the form of authority to dictatorship or theocracy. However, the current crisis of political representation signals the need to re-think the significance of the sovereign as the representative leader and/or of the people as an empowered body. Political theology has proposed an understanding of the relations of power between the representative and the represented.  

In this dossier, Revista Pléyade invites submissions addressing the concepts of sovereignty, representation and authority, both from the traditional perspective of an authoritarian conception of power, as well as from the perspective of democratic theory, or from new conceptions of the relation between politics and religion.  


Coordination Dossier: Ely Orrego Torres –

Submission deadline: October 28th, 2011

Languages: Submissions in Spanish or English  

Date of Publication:  December 2011


Submissions should be addressed electronically to:

More information:


Ely Orrego Torres

Editora Revista Pléyade
Centro de Análisis e Investigación Política


Posted here by Glenn Rikowski

The Flow of Ideas: